Which Supreme Court case established that post-probationary teachers are entitled to due process under the 14th Amendment?

Which Supreme Court case established that post-probationary teachers are entitled to due process under the 14th Amendment?

• A. Board of Education v. Earls
• B. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth
• C. Perry v. Sindermann
• D. Goss v. Lopez

Answer: (B)

The case of Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth is significant because it addressed the due process rights of post-probationary teachers under the 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled that public employees, including teachers, who have a property interest in their jobs are entitled to certain protections when faced with termination or non-renewal of their contracts. This decision clarified that post-probationary teachers, having established a certain level of job security, cannot be dismissed without being afforded a fair process, including notice and an opportunity for a hearing. This ruling reinforced the notion that public employees have a legitimate claim to their position and related rights, thus highlighting the importance of due process in employment decisions within the educational context. Other cases mentioned, such as Goss v. Lopez, deal with different aspects of due process in education settings, but do not specifically address the employment rights of teachers in the same manner as Roth.

The case of Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth is significant because it addressed the due process rights of post-probationary teachers under the 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled that public employees, including teachers, who have a property interest in their jobs are entitled to certain protections when faced with termination or non-renewal of their contracts. This decision clarified that post-probationary teachers, having established a certain level of job security, cannot be dismissed without being afforded a fair process, including notice and an opportunity for a hearing.

This ruling reinforced the notion that public employees have a legitimate claim to their position and related rights, thus highlighting the importance of due process in employment decisions within the educational context. Other cases mentioned, such as Goss v. Lopez, deal with different aspects of due process in education settings, but do not specifically address the employment rights of teachers in the same manner as Roth.